Not off-topic: Wrong couple divorced after computer error by law firm Vardag's

[Norbert Preining]

Hi Jonathan,

> SUMMARY: The TeX community is lagging behind lawyers in creation of archive
> ready documents, as shown in a recent high-profile High Court judgement.

PDF is *archive ready*. In fact, it is better than HTML for archival
purposes, since HTML depends on the interpretation of the engine.
Furthermore, we are working on good solutions for HTML conversion
(LaTeXML), see recent improvements and provision of HTML formats at
arXiv.

> This shows that the legal profession is considerably ahead of the TeX
> community, in providing documents in multiple formats. Further the UK
> National Archives support the production as storage of such multiple format
> documents.

Archiving is not depending on having *multiple* formats.

> This is particularly important to us because Don Knuth intended (and
> succeeded) in making TeX archival. However, most open source TeX-based
> workflows do not support creation of high-quality HTML and XML output.

LaTeXML has a very high conversion success on the arXiv corpus of about
2.4M articles.

I am VERY sure that LaTeXML does have not the slightest problem
converting legal documents (because I know where the problems are).

So, what do you suggest?

Best regards

Norbert

--
PREINING Norbert                              https://www.preining.info
arXiv / Cornell University   +   IFMGA Guide   +   TU Wien  +  TeX Live
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13