[tex-k] diffs in trap.log

Wolfgang Helbig helbig at mailbox.org
Tue Oct 20 11:06:06 CEST 2020


Hi,
Checking my port of metafont with the trap test, I noticed a lot of 
differences in trap.log of the second run of inimf, that I cannot 
explain. They differ in the pointer values of capsules, but I neither 
changed the memory management and I checked all the constant values, 
they are either original or changed for the trap test.

Any hints? Should I worry?

Greetings
-- 
Wolfgang Helbig

1c1
< This is METAFONT-FPC, 2nd ed. (preloaded base=trap 2020.10.20)  20 OCT 
2020 09:21
---
 > This is METAFONT, Version 2.7182818 (preloaded base=trap 2014.1.7)  7 
JAN 2014 18:11
76a77
 >
1824c1825
< String usage 24&92 (860&11374 still untouched)
---
 > String usage 24&92 (858&11309 still untouched)
3692,3694c3693,3695
< xpart %CAPSULE1370=xx
< %CAPSULE1378=2yy-2
< %CAPSULE1386 = 3.3333xx+3.3333
---
 > xpart %CAPSULE1359=xx
 > %CAPSULE1367=2yy-2
 > %CAPSULE1375 = 3.3333xx+3.3333

The diff ends with:

3800,3809c3801,3810
< {(%CAPSULE1051)+(1)}
< ### -%CAPSULE1051=-%CAPSULE1378+1
< {(1/2)*(%CAPSULE1378)}
< ### -0.5%CAPSULE1378=-%CAPSULE1370
< {-(%CAPSULE1370)}
< ### %CAPSULE1370=-%CAPSULE1362
< {(2)*(%CAPSULE1362)}
< ### -2%CAPSULE1362=-%CAPSULE1354
< {(-0.5%CAPSULE1354-0.5)=(%CAPSULE1354)}
< ## %CAPSULE1354=-0.33333
---
 > {(%CAPSULE1494)+(1)}
 > ### -%CAPSULE1494=-%CAPSULE1350+1
 > {(1/2)*(%CAPSULE1350)}
 > ### -0.5%CAPSULE1350=-%CAPSULE1367
 > {-(%CAPSULE1367)}
 > ### %CAPSULE1367=-%CAPSULE1893
 > {(2)*(%CAPSULE1893)}
 > ### -2%CAPSULE1893=-%CAPSULE1885
 > {(-0.5%CAPSULE1885-0.5)=(%CAPSULE1885)}
 > ## %CAPSULE1885=-0.33333
3965a3967
 >
4233c4235
< String usage 41&161 (817&7699 still untouched)
---
 > String usage 41&161 (815&7634 still untouched)
4249,4250c4251,4252
<  68 strings out of 885
<  3752 string characters out of 11451
---
 >  68 strings out of 883
 >  3752 string characters out of 11386



More information about the tex-k mailing list.