[tex-k] diffs in trap.log
Wolfgang Helbig
helbig at mailbox.org
Tue Oct 20 11:06:06 CEST 2020
Hi,
Checking my port of metafont with the trap test, I noticed a lot of
differences in trap.log of the second run of inimf, that I cannot
explain. They differ in the pointer values of capsules, but I neither
changed the memory management and I checked all the constant values,
they are either original or changed for the trap test.
Any hints? Should I worry?
Greetings
--
Wolfgang Helbig
1c1
< This is METAFONT-FPC, 2nd ed. (preloaded base=trap 2020.10.20) 20 OCT
2020 09:21
---
> This is METAFONT, Version 2.7182818 (preloaded base=trap 2014.1.7) 7
JAN 2014 18:11
76a77
>
1824c1825
< String usage 24&92 (860&11374 still untouched)
---
> String usage 24&92 (858&11309 still untouched)
3692,3694c3693,3695
< xpart %CAPSULE1370=xx
< %CAPSULE1378=2yy-2
< %CAPSULE1386 = 3.3333xx+3.3333
---
> xpart %CAPSULE1359=xx
> %CAPSULE1367=2yy-2
> %CAPSULE1375 = 3.3333xx+3.3333
The diff ends with:
3800,3809c3801,3810
< {(%CAPSULE1051)+(1)}
< ### -%CAPSULE1051=-%CAPSULE1378+1
< {(1/2)*(%CAPSULE1378)}
< ### -0.5%CAPSULE1378=-%CAPSULE1370
< {-(%CAPSULE1370)}
< ### %CAPSULE1370=-%CAPSULE1362
< {(2)*(%CAPSULE1362)}
< ### -2%CAPSULE1362=-%CAPSULE1354
< {(-0.5%CAPSULE1354-0.5)=(%CAPSULE1354)}
< ## %CAPSULE1354=-0.33333
---
> {(%CAPSULE1494)+(1)}
> ### -%CAPSULE1494=-%CAPSULE1350+1
> {(1/2)*(%CAPSULE1350)}
> ### -0.5%CAPSULE1350=-%CAPSULE1367
> {-(%CAPSULE1367)}
> ### %CAPSULE1367=-%CAPSULE1893
> {(2)*(%CAPSULE1893)}
> ### -2%CAPSULE1893=-%CAPSULE1885
> {(-0.5%CAPSULE1885-0.5)=(%CAPSULE1885)}
> ## %CAPSULE1885=-0.33333
3965a3967
>
4233c4235
< String usage 41&161 (817&7699 still untouched)
---
> String usage 41&161 (815&7634 still untouched)
4249,4250c4251,4252
< 68 strings out of 885
< 3752 string characters out of 11451
---
> 68 strings out of 883
> 3752 string characters out of 11386
More information about the tex-k
mailing list.