[tldoc] Updated Russian translation of tlmgr

[Paulo Roberto Massa Cereda]

 > That was good, because I don't trust the mailers.  Most convenient to
 > send the new file as a gzipped attachment in the future, ok?

Oops, my bad. I blame the tea -- I ran out of coffee. :)

It wouldn't be me if I didn't make any classic mistake on every release 
of my translation. It seems it's now a tradition in the tl-doc list. :)

 >      In other news, just a doubt: there is a 'translators' file
 >      inside, well, the translations directory. :P Would it be wise
 >      to update it as well?
 >
 > Done :).

Yay! :)

 > BTW, the Project-Id-Version fields shows a wide variance among the
 > translations.  Does it matter?  I rather suspect not, but if it does,
 > something like
 >    Project-Id-Version: TeX Live translation\n
 > With no TL year number would seem least prone to going stale.

I think it's a nice idea. :)

Best wishes,

Paulo

Em 12/05/2012 20:35, Karl Berry escreveu:
>      several new messages were introduced, so I'm sending updated Russian
>      translation of tlmgr interface.
>
> Thanks, installed.
>
>      Sorry for the delay in sending the updated PT-BR translation. It's
>      sync'd with the 20120511 install-tl build.
>
> Thanks, installed.
>
>      In case anything goes terribly wrong, the file is also available here:
>      https://github.com/cereda/texlive-ptbr
>
> That was good, because I don't trust the mailers.  Most convenient to
> send the new file as a gzipped attachment in the future, ok?
>
>      In other news, just a doubt: there is a 'translators' file inside, well,
>      the translations directory. :P Would it be wise to update it as well?
>
> Done :).
>
>
> BTW, the Project-Id-Version fields shows a wide variance among the
> translations.  Does it matter?  I rather suspect not, but if it does,
> something like
>    Project-Id-Version: TeX Live translation\n
> With no TL year number would seem least prone to going stale.
>
> I rather think Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: should consistently be this list
> (tldoc), too, not the general tex-live list?  Again, not that it really
> matters, I suppose.
>
> k