[texhax] Inter-sentence space with amsthm

pierre.mackay at comcast.net pierre.mackay at comcast.net
Wed Aug 5 14:30:23 CEST 2009


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Uwe Lück" <uwe.lueck at web.de> 
To: "Joel C. Salomon" <joelcsalomon at gmail.com>, "texhax" <texhax at tug.org> 
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2009 7:17:17 AM (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected 
Subject: Re: [texhax] Inter-sentence space with amsthm 

[Please ignore previous, too many errors, partially due to Arial. I use 
single right quotes on both sides for quoting here because the original 
posting used this style. That's important with '\sfcode`\.'!] 

At 02:54 23.06.09, Joel C. Salomon wrote: 
>I'm playing with amsthm, and want to define a theorem style like: 
> Example:**To avoid lithobraking, most rockets... 
> where the '**' is the wide space TeX puts between sentences. 
> 
>The eight[th] argument to \newtheoremstyle is the "head space"; and I know 
>I can give it an explicit (inter-word) space, '\newline', or a dimension 
>like 0.5em. But what is the size of the inter-sentence space? 

It is described on pp. 75f. of the TeXbook. With '\frenchspacing', you get 
inter-sentence space just by ' ' or '\space', i.e., inter-sentence space 
doesn't differ from inter-word space. With '\nonfrenchspacing', you get the 
inter-sentence space the same way as before, if the current \spacefactor is 
3000, so just precede the same space with '\spacefactor=3000' ... however: 
not so easy ... better type: '\spacefactor=3000\relax\space' ('\ ' in 
place of '\space' doesn't work). More generally, one might /define/ 
inter-sentence space as the horizontal glue that is inserted after the dot 
of '\spacefactor=1000. ' (arguing that '. ' is the "definitive sentence 
delimiter"). In this sense the space is obtained by 
'\spacefactor=\sfcode`\. '. (Note the space after '\.'. Not tested.) 

HTH -- Uwe Lueck. 

Just a slight clarification for the required space after `\. 
or for any other char number. The space is there to terminate the number, as with all other numbers. If you don't have it, and the next character happens to be a number, TeX goes on evaluating digits, and you get a result that is much too large to be a char number. A good protection against this is {} or enclosing braces. 

Pierre MacKay 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/attachments/20090805/cc02c3ce/attachment.html>


More information about the texhax mailing list