[texhax] the \let command
Philip TAYLOR
P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk
Mon Nov 27 17:54:45 CET 2006
Surely because \t is recursively defined in terms of itself,
n'est-ce pas ?
** Phil.
--------
tom sgouros wrote:
> Perhaps this will make it clearer:
>
> \documentclass{article}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> \t bb
>
> \let\tie\t
> \def\t{t}
> \let\mycedilla\c
> \def\c{c}
>
> \t bb
> \tie bb
> \c b
> \mycedilla b
>
> \end{document}
>
> Please explain why the "\t bb" at the beginning of the file behaves
> differently from the "\tie bb" further down. When I try this, the first
> "\t bb" makes a tie over the "bb", but the "\tie bb" produces what
> appears to be an italic "t" followed by a "bb". My understanding of the
> \let would imply to me that the \tie should be identical to the original
> definition of the \t, but it is not. Why not?
>
> -tom
>
More information about the texhax
mailing list