[tex-live] linguex in texlive snapshot
Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
mpg at elzevir.fr
Wed Aug 13 18:31:26 CEST 2008
Robin Fairbairns scripsit (13.08.2008 17:14)
> Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <mpg at elzevir.fr> wrote:
>
>> You can see that supposed obsolescence is not in the reasons. By the way, I'm
>> not sure lack of space is still a possible reason either, now that we don't
>> try to fit in a single CD any more.
>
> as i've already said, i don't believe the gb4e stuff ought to be on tex
> live at all.
>
Oh, the licences problem again. Well, I don't think it's good to rm things
form TL without contacting the author and asking him to clarify if the status
is just noinfo and the stuff is not clearly non-free. And this takes time as
you probably know very well. I'm not sure I want to do this right know...
Putting the thing on my list anyway.
> i've discussed with karl the need for sorting these "unknown" licence
> statements in the catalogue: gb4e is one of those packages that will (in
> the new world) be classified as "noinfo" (i.e., no information provided
> about licensing conditions).
>
By the way, it would be great to share efforts concerning this licence thing.
It's obviously a huge task, and it would be bad to double or triple-check
some packages just because the TL peoples don't know what has been checked by
the Ctan people or vice-versa. (The Debian guys are also interested in
comprehensive licence check I think, and maybe others linux/bsd/whatever
distro may be interested in it.)
What do you (Robin, ctan-ers, Karl, others) think of discussing a
collaborative structure to share information about what is to be done, what
has already be done, author contacts, etc. some day in the near future?
Manuel.
More information about the tex-live
mailing list