[tex-live] last weekend changes
Staszek Wawrykiewicz
staw at gust.org.pl
Tue Mar 23 22:26:45 CET 2004
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Thomas Esser wrote:
> > pdftexconfig.tex has nothing to do when \pdfoutput=0 so reading
> > one more file seems redundant.
>
> Make your own test:
> latex -ini latex.ltx # so without reading pdftexconfig
> latex '\pdfoutput=1\input sample2e'
>
> Then:
> latex -ini latex.ini # with pdftexconfig
> latex '\pdfoutput=1\input sample2e'
>
> And compare the two versions of sample2e.pdf. Which one do you prefer? :-)
Good examples! ;-) But... somehow crazy. I'd prefer to stick that
running latex means producing .dvi and running pdflatex - .pdf.
And not telling the people about such possibilities ;-)
Anyway, we have something more interesting:
so many existing documents already have
\ifx\pdfoutput\undefined
.... % concerning dvi
\else
\usepackage{yy} % pdf
Now, even for latex run \pdfoutput is always known, so I'd tend
to put into some .ini (latex, mex etc.) files just
\pdfoutput=0\let\pdfoutput\undefined
Thanks,
--
Staszek Wawrykiewicz
StaW at gust.org.pl
More information about the tex-live
mailing list