[metapost] rfc: consistent color values
Daniel H. Luecking
luecking at uark.edu
Mon Apr 11 17:28:38 CEST 2005
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Thank you Dan, Hans,
>
> It is much clearer now. If I understand correctly, you are both
> just being lazy and do not want to do boundary folding yourselves,
> right? :-)
I wouldn't have to do it now. Why would I want to increase my work?
(Then we get into the question: what is a color? :-)
Anyway, I have no problem with Jacko's proposal except that it
slightly increases the number of variables that might have to
be checked.
Speaking of which, does anyone know what a PS interpreter is supposed to
do if an rgb color has out-of-range components? (I'm wondering how
important it would be for a macro package to know the value of the
proposed truecolors and program around it.)
Dan
--
Dan Luecking
Dept. of Mathematical Sciences
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR 72101
More information about the metapost
mailing list